ACCA Advanced Financial Management (AFM) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment

Get ready for your ACCA AFM Exam with in-depth study tools! Engage with flashcards, multiple choice questions, detailed explanations, and hints. Elevate your exam preparation skills!

Practice this question and more.


What is true regarding the combination and splitting of assets?

  1. It will always affect the asset value

  2. It does not affect value as long as it does not affect investor choice

  3. It guarantees an increase in the total value

  4. It is irrelevant in all contexts

The correct answer is: It does not affect value as long as it does not affect investor choice

When considering the combination and splitting of assets in the context of financial management, the correct understanding hinges on how these actions impact investor choices and perceptions rather than the intrinsic value of the assets themselves. Combining or splitting assets—often referred to in finance as consolidation or division—can influence how investors perceive these assets. However, as long as these actions do not change the actual valuation of the cash flows generated by those assets or the risk associated with them, the overall value to the firm does not necessarily change. This perspective is based on the notion that value is linked to the cash flows and the risk profile rather than the specific arrangement of the assets. Investor behavior plays a critical role in this context. Splitting shares might make them more accessible to small investors, potentially increasing demand, but it does not inherently alter the company's fundamental value. Similarly, combining assets into a single entity could streamline operations and appeal to certain investors, but it again does not change the underlying worth as long as it does not alter investor choice. Option A, suggesting that it will always affect the asset value, lacks nuance, as the effects depend on how investors perceive the arrangement rather than a direct change in value. Option C implies a guaranteed increase which is not accurate because mere restructuring